Mass Tort vs. Class Action: Key Differences Explained

Scott Hechinger

WRITTEN BY Scott Hechinger

Updated on February 18, 2025

Creshonda Smith

FACT CHECKED BY check

Creshonda Smith

Legal battles can feel overwhelming, especially when many people are affected by the same issue. In these situations, there are two main legal paths: mass tort and class action lawsuits. Knowing the difference can have a big impact on the compensation and justice you receive. Both approaches handle cases with multiple plaintiffs, but they have different structures and processes.

Let’s break down what makes each of them unique so you can understand which one may apply to your situation.

What Is a Mass Tort?

A mass tort is a legal action involving many plaintiffs suing the same defendant. Each plaintiff files an individual case. They have their own legal counsel. Unlike a class action suit, one ruling does not apply to the entire group of plaintiffs.

Mass tort claims often arise from widespread harm. Examples include asbestos exposure, defective medical devices, or dangerous drugs like Zantac. In these cases, many people suffer similar injuries but require separate evaluations of their damages.

The court consolidates these cases to streamline the litigation process. Plaintiffs share evidence and expert testimony to avoid delays. However, each case is still handled on its own. This allows plaintiffs to seek compensation that reflects their unique harm.

What Is a Class Action?

A class action is a legal case where a large group of people, known as class members, sue a defendant together. These plaintiffs have similar claims and are represented by class representatives. Instead of handling each case individually, the court issues one decision that applies to the entire class.

Class actions are common in situations where numerous plaintiffs suffer small but similar losses. Examples include cases of false advertising, data breaches, or defective products. Since individual lawsuits might not be worth pursuing, a class action allows plaintiffs to combine their claims for stronger legal standing.

The litigation process in a class action is highly structured. Courts follow strict federal rules to certify the class before the case can proceed. This ensures that the claims are similar enough to justify a single lawsuit. Once certified, the case moves forward as a unified mass tort action.

Class actions streamline complex legal cases under one lawsuit. This helps save time and resources. However, individual plaintiffs typically cannot opt for separate trials. The court’s decision is binding, ensuring consistency across all claims.

Differences Between Mass Tort and Class Action Lawsuits

Both mass tort and class action lawsuits handle cases involving multiple plaintiffs, but their structures differ. In a class action, plaintiffs are grouped as one entity. A single court decision applies to everyone. In contrast, mass tort litigation allows plaintiffs to file individual claims, each handled separately.

Case management is also different. Class action lawsuits follow strict civil procedure rules to certify the class before proceeding. Mass tort cases often involve multidistrict litigation (MDL), where federal courts consolidate similar lawsuits for efficiency. Despite this, each plaintiff in a mass tort retains control of their case.

Damages in class actions are divided equally or based on a court-approved formula. Plaintiffs do not negotiate separately. In mass tort cases, compensation varies depending on each plaintiff’s unique injury or loss. This makes mass torts more suitable for cases with distinct damages across plaintiffs.

Legal representation also varies. Class members are represented by class representatives and share the same legal team. In a mass tort action, plaintiffs have their own legal counsel to advocate for their specific claims and compensation. Both approaches aim to manage large-scale litigation efficiently but with different methods.

Benefits of Mass Tort Lawsuits

Mass tort lawsuits focus on individual cases. Each plaintiff can pursue compensation based on their own injuries. This is common in cases like defective drugs or environmental harm. Plaintiffs retain greater control over their legal claims.

  • Individual compensation: Damages are based on each plaintiff’s unique experience.
  • Legal control: Plaintiffs have their own legal counsel and separate case outcomes.
  • Consolidated process: Courts handle multiple cases together to streamline complex litigation.
  • Potential for higher damages: Individual claims may result in larger payouts than class actions.

Benefits of Class Action Lawsuits

Class actions consolidate many claims into a single lawsuit. This simplifies legal procedures for large groups. It also reduces the costs for plaintiffs by sharing legal expenses. Class actions are used when individual claims would be too small to pursue alone.

  • Simplified legal process: The court handles one case instead of many.
  • Lower costs: Plaintiffs share legal fees through a single law firm.
  • Class certification: Courts confirm that the claims are similar enough to move forward together.
  • Consistent rulings: A single decision applies to all plaintiffs involved, avoiding varied outcomes.

Mass Tort vs Class Action Lawsuit: How To Choose

The right choice depends on how the case is structured. Attorneys consider the type of harm, number of plaintiffs, and compensation needs. Each option offers distinct advantages based on these factors.

Type of Harm

Mass torts handle cases where injuries differ between plaintiffs. Class actions work for cases where all plaintiffs suffer the same harm, like false advertising or product defects.

Damages sought:

Mass torts allow each plaintiff to seek compensation based on their personal damages. This is beneficial for those with severe or unique injuries. In class actions, plaintiffs receive a share of a single settlement. This is efficient when individual claims are too small to justify separate lawsuits.

Case structure:

Class actions consolidate all claims under one lawsuit. This leads to a single court ruling that applies to all class members. Mass torts involve individual claims but share evidence and legal resources to streamline the process. This allows cases to move forward without unnecessary delays.

Number of plaintiffs:

Class actions are designed for large groups of plaintiffs with identical claims. They help courts manage thousands of claims more easily. Mass torts are better when fewer people are affected, but with varying degrees of harm and damages. Each case is treated on its own merits.

How Attorneys Evaluate Cases for Mass Tort or Class Action

Experienced attorneys assess each case to decide the best approach. They consider the number of plaintiffs, the type of harm, and the extent of damages. The goal is to determine whether a mass tort or class action is more suitable.

For mass torts, attorneys look for cases where plaintiffs have similar injuries but different levels of harm. These cases often involve defective drugs, toxic exposure, or faulty medical devices. Individual claims allow plaintiffs to seek compensation based on their specific damages.

In class action lawsuits, the claims must be nearly identical. Attorneys check if the case can meet class certification requirements. This type of lawsuit works well for widespread harm, such as false advertising or product defects. The case is handled as a single, consolidated process.

Attorneys also evaluate the complexity of the case. Large cases need strong coordination between courts, plaintiffs, and law firms. Proper case management ensures efficient handling and better chances for fair compensation.

FAQs

Can A Single Case Transition From A Class Action To A Mass Tort?

Yes, but it rarely happens. Courts may change a class action to a mass tort if the plaintiffs’ injuries are too different. In this situation, each plaintiff files an individual case. However, cases remain consolidated to share evidence and resources.

How Are Damages Calculated In Mass Tort Cases?

Damages are calculated based on each plaintiff’s specific harm. Courts consider medical bills, lost wages, pain, and long-term effects. Evidence is presented to show how the injury impacted the plaintiff’s life. Compensation amounts vary depending on the severity of the damages.

Are There Time Limits To File These Lawsuits?

Yes, time limits apply. These deadlines, called statutes of limitations, differ by state and case type. Some cases start when the harm is discovered, such as in defective drug claims. Missing the deadline means losing the right to sue. Early legal advice is critical.

What Types Of Cases Are Better Suited For Mass Tort?

Mass torts are suited for cases where harm varies between plaintiffs. Examples include defective drugs, toxic exposure, and faulty medical devices. These cases need individual claims due to differences in damages. Mass torts provide efficiency while still treating each case separately.

Conclusion

Understanding mass tort and class action lawsuits is crucial for protecting your rights. Each structure works differently and can impact your case outcome. Choosing the wrong approach could limit your compensation.

Here’s a quick breakdown:

  • Mass torts: Ideal when injuries differ. Each plaintiff files their own claim and seeks individual compensation.
  • Class action lawsuits: Suitable for similar claims. Cases are combined into one lawsuit with a shared outcome. Costs are lower, but plaintiffs have less control over the case.

The type of harm, number of plaintiffs, and compensation needs are key factors in determining the right path. Courts follow strict procedures to manage both legal structures efficiently. However, these cases can still be complex.

You don’t have to make these decisions alone. Seeking advice from experienced attorneys can make a difference. They will evaluate your case, explain your options, and guide you toward the best course of action. 

Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should consult with a licensed attorney for legal guidance regarding their specific situation. The content is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. 

Why Trust

The Justice Collaborative

We are a team of media and legal professionals dedicated to advocating for fairness, protecting legal rights and pursuing justice for individuals and communities. We employ strict measures to ensure the accuracy of our information, any content found to be false, misleading, or distorted is promptly addressed.